For example I train my SVM on 3 features set of different size:
Training data size [rows cols]:
- features1 [nsamples 100]
- features2 [nsamples 50]
- features3 [nsamples 128]
And for each feature set I get accuracy >0.5. I assume that combining features by concatenating them [nsamples 278] will give me better results then any of feature set separately.
Is that assumption always true?